<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women&#8217;s Rights: Is equality still an illusion?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conversationsforabetterworld.com/2010/02/womens-rights-its-their-problem-not-ours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conversationsforabetterworld.com/2010/02/womens-rights-its-their-problem-not-ours/</link>
	<description>A social platform for raising global issues and finding solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:57:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Spiritual Cowardice &#38; Cruelty of Radical Islam: No Holy Religion of God Would Do This to Their Women &#171; Actuality 777</title>
		<link>http://www.conversationsforabetterworld.com/2010/02/womens-rights-its-their-problem-not-ours/comment-page-1/#comment-3187</link>
		<dc:creator>The Spiritual Cowardice &#38; Cruelty of Radical Islam: No Holy Religion of God Would Do This to Their Women &#171; Actuality 777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 23:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversationsforabetterworld.com/?p=2473#comment-3187</guid>
		<description>[...] Iranian Balochs (huffingtonpost.com) I should have read my Islamic marriage contract. (slate.com) Women&#8217;s Rights: Is equality still an illusion? (conversationsforabetterworld.com) A global wake-up call about abuse of women (boston.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Iranian Balochs (huffingtonpost.com) I should have read my Islamic marriage contract. (slate.com) Women&#8217;s Rights: Is equality still an illusion? (conversationsforabetterworld.com) A global wake-up call about abuse of women (boston.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gender equality islam</title>
		<link>http://www.conversationsforabetterworld.com/2010/02/womens-rights-its-their-problem-not-ours/comment-page-1/#comment-2349</link>
		<dc:creator>gender equality islam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 04:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversationsforabetterworld.com/?p=2473#comment-2349</guid>
		<description>The issue of woman in Islam was clear and never debated among Muslims. Allah (swt) created men and women and legislated general responsibilities for both, such as carrying the Daw&#039;ah and holding the rulers accountable, in addition to designating specific responsibilities for each gender. Muslims acknowledged that sovereignty belongs to Allah, and the rules related to both men and women are Islamic rules deduced through ijtihad based upon the daleel. It was implicitly recognized among Muslims that the process of ijtihad and the concept of daleel are not sex-dependent, and thus, a &#039;&#039;male&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;female&#039;&#039; understanding of Islam never emerged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue of woman in Islam was clear and never debated among Muslims. Allah (swt) created men and women and legislated general responsibilities for both, such as carrying the Daw&#8217;ah and holding the rulers accountable, in addition to designating specific responsibilities for each gender. Muslims acknowledged that sovereignty belongs to Allah, and the rules related to both men and women are Islamic rules deduced through ijtihad based upon the daleel. It was implicitly recognized among Muslims that the process of ijtihad and the concept of daleel are not sex-dependent, and thus, a &#8221;male&#8221; or &#8221;female&#8221; understanding of Islam never emerged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
